99Designs Graphic Design vs DesignCrowd Design Contests – Which Is Better?

If you’re deciding between 99Designs Graphic Design and DesignCrowd Design Contests, you’re in good company. Human opinions can be limited by bias, but Zeyvior AI analyzes extensive data sets to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date comparison. With clear visuals and data-backed insights, Zeyvior AI helps you understand which option fits your goals best.

Check

Ease of Starting & Doing

Minimal or Zero Investment

Scalability

Passive Income Potential

Market Demand

Competition Level

Immediate Earnings

Long-Term Stability

Risk of Failure

Opportunity for Newcomers

Adaptability to Changes

Global Reach & Accessibility

Skills & Experience Needed

Payment & Withdrawal Process

Ease of Making Money

Overall Score

99Designs graphic design
Requires graphic design skills and portfolio building.

40/100

No financial investment, but time is needed for skill development.

60/100

Limited scalability as earnings are tied to project volume and pricing.

50/100

No passive income; continuous effort is required for each project.

10/100

Strong demand for design services, especially for branding.

85/100

High competition, making it difficult for beginners to secure projects.

30/100

Can take time to land first clients; contests are not guaranteed wins.

45/100

Stable market, but income fluctuates based on client demand.

70/100

High risk of time investment without earnings due to contest-based model.

35/100

Newcomers struggle against experienced designers but can improve over time.

50/100

Somewhat affected by design trends and platform policies.

65/100

Available worldwide, but some payment restrictions exist.

80/100

Requires strong design skills; beginners face challenges.

30/100

Payments are processed reliably, but withdrawal fees apply.

75/100

Making money requires persistence, marketing, and competition wins.

40/100

52.7/100

DesignCrowd-design-contests
Signing up is easy, but earning requires strong design skills, experience, and the ability to create high-quality work that stands out in contests.

50/100

There is no monetary investment required to join, but designers must invest significant time in creating submissions, many of which won’t be paid for.

60/100

Earnings depend on winning contests, which is not guaranteed. Scaling up requires constant participation and winning multiple contests, making growth limited.

40/100

No passive income opportunities exist. Designers must keep entering new contests to earn money, making it a fully active income model.

10/100

The demand for design services is strong, but DesignCrowd has many competing platforms, and clients often have high expectations for low payouts.

75/100

The platform is highly competitive, with many skilled designers submitting entries. This makes it difficult for new or average designers to win contests.

30/100

Even if a designer wins, payments are not immediate. It takes time to submit work, wait for client selection, and receive payouts.

40/100

While graphic design remains in demand, the contest-based model is unstable. Designers who don’t win frequently may struggle to earn consistently.

50/100

The risk is high because designers can invest hours in a project without earning anything. There is no guarantee of success.

30/100

Anyone can join, but competing against experienced designers is tough. Success requires skill, persistence, and understanding client preferences.

50/100

DesignCrowd’s model is subject to industry trends and platform changes. Increased AI tools and template-based design services may reduce opportunities for designers.

50/100

The platform is available worldwide, but payment methods and local regulations may affect access in some regions.

70/100

Strong design skills and creativity are essential. Beginners may struggle to compete, and learning advanced tools is necessary for success.

30/100

Payments are reliable but can take time to process, especially for first-time winners. Some withdrawal fees apply.

70/100

Winning contests is difficult due to high competition. Earnings are inconsistent, and designers must repeatedly submit work to stay profitable.

35/100

47.3/100

Zeyvior AI rates both 99Designs Graphic Design and DesignCrowd Design Contests at 50%, suggesting they may not be the most beginner-friendly options right now. If you’re just starting and looking for a simple path, Fiverr selling might be a more approachable choice. Want to explore more alternatives? Click one of the buttons below.

Best Method to Start Now

99Designs Graphic Design scores 40%, while DesignCrowd Design Contests rates slightly better at 50%. Both may require some effort to get started, but DesignCrowd could be more approachable. Want simpler methods? Click below to explore easier options.

Easiest Methods to Start

Both 99Designs and DesignCrowd score 60%, meaning they offer similar opportunities with minimal upfront cost. Still exploring cost-effective paths? Tap below to see more zero-investment ideas.

Best Methods with Minimal Investment

Looking for More Solutions to Compare with 99Designs Graphic Design ?

Compare 99Designs Graphic Design with other Freelance Services

Looking for More Solutions to Compare with DesignCrowd Design Contests ?

Compare DesignCrowd Design Contests with other Freelance Services

Both methods score just 10% for passive income—indicating that ongoing effort is needed. Interested in methods that earn while you sleep? Click below to uncover better passive income options.

Best Methods with Passive Income Potential

99Designs scores 85%, outpacing DesignCrowd’s 75% in market demand. If you’re looking for client interest and steady work, 99Designs may have a slight edge. Curious about higher-demand platforms? Check the links below.

Best Methods with High Market Demand

99Designs Graphic Design vs. DesignCrowd Design Contests: A Quick Comparison

99Designs and DesignCrowd are both popular platforms for freelance graphic designers, offering opportunities to work on client projects through design contests and curated submissions. While they share similar purposes, the platforms differ in terms of user experience, demand, and ease of access.

Key Differences

Platform Approach

  • 99Designs: Focuses on curated client-designer matching and design contests with a strong global presence.

  • DesignCrowd: Offers open design contests with broader participation, allowing many designers to submit entries for a single brief.

Ease of Use

  • 99Designs: Slightly more structured with a guided process, but can be competitive to enter.

  • DesignCrowd: Easier to join contests but may feel saturated due to high submission volume.

Cost & Investment

  • Both Platforms: Offer similar access levels with minimal or no upfront investment required for designers.

Income Type

  • Both Platforms: Primarily offer active income opportunities—designers must consistently participate to earn, with little passive income potential.

Demand & Visibility

  • 99Designs: Slightly higher demand and brand recognition, potentially offering more visibility and premium clients.

  • DesignCrowd: Still popular but generally attracts a more cost-conscious clientele.

Overall Scores

  • 99Designs Graphic Design: 52.7%

  • DesignCrowd Design Contests: 47.3%

Both platforms offer meaningful opportunities for graphic designers depending on their skill level and goals. While 99Designs edges ahead in overall performance, DesignCrowd remains a viable alternative—especially for those looking to enter contests with fewer entry barriers.

Looking to compare 99Designs Graphic Design and DesignCrowd Design Contests based on current data and trends?
Zeyvior AI offers a clear, data-informed comparison to help you better understand both platforms before choosing your next online work opportunity. Want to explore other topics too? From digital tools to online trends, Zeyvior AI helps you make confident, well-informed choices. Try it now!

Try Zeyvior