SolidGigs Curated Gigs vs DesignCrowd Design Contests – Which is Better?

If you’re trying to decide between SolidGigs Curated Gigs and DesignCrowd Design Contests, you’re not the only one weighing the options. Zeyvior AI helps by reviewing extensive data and current trends to offer a clear, balanced comparison. With visual and numerical insights, it makes it easier to understand how each platform works—so you can choose the one that fits your needs.

Ease of Starting & Doing

Minimal or Zero Investment

Scalability

Passive Income Potential

Market Demand

Competition Level

Immediate Earnings

Long-Term Stability

Risk of Failure

Opportunity for Newcomers

Adaptability to Changes

Global Reach & Accessibility

Skills & Experience Needed

Payment & Withdrawal Process

Ease of Making Money

Overall Score

SolidGigs curated gigs

SolidGigs simplifies job searching, but freelancers must still apply, pitch, and secure gigs.

50/100

Requires a monthly subscription ($19/month) and time spent on proposals.

40/100

Income depends on securing gigs; scaling requires more clients or raising rates.

55/100

No passive income; freelancers must actively work for each payment.

20/100

High demand for freelance services in various industries.

80/100

Freelancing is highly competitive, even with curated gigs.

40/100

Finding and securing work takes time, but payments can be quick once a project is completed.

45/100

Freelancing can be sustainable, but income fluctuates based on client demand.

60/100

No guarantees of securing work; subscription fee is a recurring cost.

50/100

Open to all skill levels, but those with experience fare better.

75/100

Freelancing platforms and job availability fluctuate based on economic conditions.

55/100

Available worldwide, but some payment and job restrictions apply.

70/100

Some gigs require specialized skills; beginners may struggle to secure high-paying jobs.

50/100

Payments depend on clients; freelancers may face delays or platform restrictions.

75/100

Requires effort to find work, maintain clients, and get paid.

45/100

56.33/100

DesignCrowd design contests

Signing up is easy, but earning requires strong design skills, experience, and the ability to create high-quality work that stands out in contests.

50/100

There is no monetary investment required to join, but designers must invest significant time in creating submissions, many of which won’t be paid for.

60/100

Earnings depend on winning contests, which is not guaranteed. Scaling up requires constant participation and winning multiple contests, making growth limited.

40/100

No passive income opportunities exist. Designers must keep entering new contests to earn money, making it a fully active income model.

10/100

The demand for design services is strong, but DesignCrowd has many competing platforms, and clients often have high expectations for low payouts.

75/100

The platform is highly competitive, with many skilled designers submitting entries. This makes it difficult for new or average designers to win contests.

30/100

Even if a designer wins, payments are not immediate. It takes time to submit work, wait for client selection, and receive payouts.

40/100

While graphic design remains in demand, the contest-based model is unstable. Designers who don’t win frequently may struggle to earn consistently.

50/100

The risk is high because designers can invest hours in a project without earning anything. There is no guarantee of success.

30/100

Anyone can join, but competing against experienced designers is tough. Success requires skill, persistence, and understanding client preferences.

50/100

DesignCrowd’s model is subject to industry trends and platform changes. Increased AI tools and template-based design services may reduce opportunities for designers.

50/100

The platform is available worldwide, but payment methods and local regulations may affect access in some regions.

70/100

Strong design skills and creativity are essential. Beginners may struggle to compete, and learning advanced tools is necessary for success.

30/100

Payments are reliable but can take time to process, especially for first-time winners. Some withdrawal fees apply.

70/100

Winning contests is difficult due to high competition. Earnings are inconsistent, and designers must repeatedly submit work to stay profitable.

35/100

47.3/100

Zeyvior AI’s latest data suggests that SolidGigs Curated Gigs currently holds a 75% performance score, while DesignCrowd Design Contests stands at 50%. While both have their strengths, those just starting out might find Fiverr selling more beginner-friendly. Looking to explore further? Choose an option from the buttons below.

SolidGigs Curated Gigs edges out DesignCrowd Design Contests with a 45% score versus 40%, but both offer limited potential for fast cash. Interested in quicker earning options? Tap below to explore faster alternatives.

SolidGigs Curated Gigs and DesignCrowd Design Contests both score 50%, meaning they’re equally moderate when it comes to getting started. Neither stands out for simplicity. Want to explore easier ways to begin? Click the button below for beginner-friendly options.

Looking for More Solutions to Compare with SolidGigs Curated Gigs?

Compare Solidgigs Curated Gigs with other Freelance Services

Looking for More Solutions to Compare with DesignCrowd Design Contests?

Compare DesignCrowd Design Contests with other Freelance Services

DesignCrowd Design Contests scores 60%, ahead of SolidGigs Curated Gigs at 40%—making it slightly more accessible with lower upfront costs. Want to find more low-investment opportunities? Click below to see what’s out there.

With a low 20% score, SolidGigs Curated Gigs still ranks higher than DesignCrowd Design Contests at 10%—but neither is ideal for passive income. Want to explore smarter passive income options? Click the button to discover more.

SolidGigs Curated Gigs vs. DesignCrowd Design Contests: A Quick Comparison

SolidGigs Curated Gigs and DesignCrowd Design Contests are two popular platforms for freelancers looking to find work online. While they serve different niches—SolidGigs focuses on handpicked freelance gigs, and DesignCrowd emphasizes creative contests—they are often compared by users seeking flexible work options.

Key Differences

Work Style & Format

SolidGigs Curated Gigs: Offers a regularly updated list of freelance opportunities from various industries.
DesignCrowd Design Contests: Focuses on crowdsourced design competitions where only selected submissions get paid.

Ease of Use

SolidGigs Curated Gigs: Simple and straightforward, with curated listings aimed at saving time.
DesignCrowd Design Contests: More competitive, requiring users to submit work before earning.

Startup Cost & Investment

SolidGigs Curated Gigs: Typically requires a monthly subscription to access listings.
DesignCrowd Design Contests: Free to join, though earnings are not guaranteed unless chosen as a winner.

Earnings Potential

SolidGigs Curated Gigs: Can lead to consistent client work depending on the freelancer’s effort.
DesignCrowd Design Contests: One-time payouts for contest winners, with limited recurring income.

Passive Income Potential

SolidGigs Curated Gigs: Low potential, as most opportunities require active work.
DesignCrowd Design Contests: Very limited passive income opportunities.

Overall Scores

SolidGigs Curated Gigs: 56.33%
DesignCrowd Design Contests: 47.3%

While SolidGigs Curated Gigs holds a slightly higher overall score, both platforms offer unique paths for freelancers. Your choice depends on your skills, preferences, and the type of work you’re looking for.

Looking to explore the differences between SolidGigs Curated Gigs and DesignCrowd Design Contests using the latest data and trends? Zeyvior AI offers up-to-date insights to help you better understand your options. Whether you’re exploring online platforms, tech trends, or other topics, Zeyvior AI makes comparisons simple and informative. Give it a try and explore smarter.